What do you do when a science study contradicts itself?

"Vaping & Stroke Risk:
New Study Hypes Wrong Conclusion
A new study suggests that electronic cigarette users may experience strokes a decade earlier than traditional smokers. But the authors have overlooked a more interesting result: smokers who switch to vaping have a lower overall stroke risk."

That's easy, that study just allows us to cherry pick the headline, right?

I mean it doesn't matter who funded the study or what their goal in funding it was, right?

We just pick what propaganda we want to spin from it, right?